When a man proposes to a women it is an extension of his very being. Like a diary of his heart it tell of his love, his heart and his consideration. In my estimation, it is up their as one of the most courageous act in a man's life. In an act contrary to instinct, he is open to rejection, and walking into breathless moments, full of risk and reward.
I have to admit I had it easy, my now wife just wanted it private and simple. One ring and One personal touch (Will you marry me? on a Scrabble broad. her favorite game). I am a do it big guy so doing it small was just because I love her thing.
Anyway, I was on YouTube and found some video proposals. They are great, below are my favorite. The first made me cry.. Ok, they all did.. Enjoy..
If your a movie lover you will enjoy the one below.
This one made me want to dance! Back in the day, I could do that stuff.. (i have wittnesses)
I am just another dreamer struggling to find the good, the true and the beautiful amidst so much tragedy. I am simple, dyslexic, loyal, a bad speller (legendarily bad), half theologian half Ninja and famed zombie killer. I am a lover of wisdom, holder of none and follower of Jesus. I am moody, brooding, bright, and sometime bubbling over with wonder and inspiration. Yet none of that defines me. I am God’s possession. He defines me and outlines my gray in hopeful tones of blood bought brightness.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Private joke, wedding songs, and little sisters in the faith.
Their is a private joke, my wife and I share about my song choice at our wedding. The song was, "Blessed be your name" by Matt Redman. If you don't know the song it is taken from Job 2 and is about Praising God in the good and hard times. Kind of an odd song for a wedding but it was the song, I first saw her earnestly worship through and the moment I knew I wanted to marry her. Not to mention, how it incapsulates my theology of marriage in a beautiful God centered way. Here is a sample.
The bridge is particularly powerful.
Now, back to our private joke. A few months after the wedding, Emily had complications from a surgery and I almost lost her. After a long hospital stay and many months of recovery, I am happy to say she is well. Now every time we hear that song she looks at me, i look at her and we chuckle because we had no idea what we were asking God to make of our marriage. Sometimes, one of us will jokingly whisper, "we should have chosen a "bless me, bless me" song." We may not get to be parents in any traditional since (there is still a chance) but no matter what comes we know we want our marriage to sing, "blessed be the name of the Lord"
Today I watched a video testimonial from Desiring God. The video is below. It tells the story of a marriage that glorifies God in revealing God to be the true satisfaction of our souls. It is a story that passionately sings "Blessed be the name of the Lord". It resounds with such delight you can almost hear the harmony of heaven in the testimony of one momentary marriage.
I was humbled and brought to tearful worship by the story. I felt a kind of honor for the wife. I felt a "family pride" like an older brother watching his little sister "do it right" in wholehaertedly honnoring our heavenly Father.
The little momentary problems Emily and I have experienced were placed in perspective by this video. Marriage can be hard but hope can be stronger. Marriage can be difficult but God can be your delight in the middle of it. I hope it lifts you to worship like it lifted me.
In Him
J. Dawson Jarrell
Blessed be Your name
When the sun's shining down on me
When the world's 'all as it should be'
Blessed be Your name
Blessed be Your name
On the road marked with suffering
Though there's pain in the offering
Blessed be Your name
Every blessing You pour out
I'll turn back to praise
When the darkness closes in, Lord
Still I will say
Blessed be the name of the Lord
The bridge is particularly powerful.
You give and take away
You give and take away
My heart will choose to say
Lord, blessed be Your name
Now, back to our private joke. A few months after the wedding, Emily had complications from a surgery and I almost lost her. After a long hospital stay and many months of recovery, I am happy to say she is well. Now every time we hear that song she looks at me, i look at her and we chuckle because we had no idea what we were asking God to make of our marriage. Sometimes, one of us will jokingly whisper, "we should have chosen a "bless me, bless me" song." We may not get to be parents in any traditional since (there is still a chance) but no matter what comes we know we want our marriage to sing, "blessed be the name of the Lord"
Today I watched a video testimonial from Desiring God. The video is below. It tells the story of a marriage that glorifies God in revealing God to be the true satisfaction of our souls. It is a story that passionately sings "Blessed be the name of the Lord". It resounds with such delight you can almost hear the harmony of heaven in the testimony of one momentary marriage.
I was humbled and brought to tearful worship by the story. I felt a kind of honor for the wife. I felt a "family pride" like an older brother watching his little sister "do it right" in wholehaertedly honnoring our heavenly Father.
The little momentary problems Emily and I have experienced were placed in perspective by this video. Marriage can be hard but hope can be stronger. Marriage can be difficult but God can be your delight in the middle of it. I hope it lifts you to worship like it lifted me.
In Him
J. Dawson Jarrell
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The Teaching Method of Jesus (part 3.2)
The Anointing and Attention
So how did Jesus secure the attention of so many? In one sense, it was jesus, magnetic, son of God. Yet Isaiah reminds us jesus was not handsome or physical attractive, like a politician or Fabio. He was a 5'7, tan Jewish man with a stocky build, splinter-scared hands, a big nose and caring smile. (yes, this is hyperbole). It was something deeper than apperance that allowed people to attend to his words in an unforgettable way.
In John 7 we read about the Pharisees sending some officers to arrest Jesus. They made it only as close as they could hear him before deciding to disobey their orders. What happens next gives us insight into the captivating and persuasive power that Jesus commanded. John writes, "The officers then came to the chief priests and Pharisees, who said to them, "Why did you not bring him?" The officers answered, "No one ever spoke like this man!" (v. 45-46).
Their was something about his speech, something so special it could make a soldier forget his mission. I believe, the special element was truth empowered by the Spirit. The anointing on those words captured their attention and derailed them from their purpose. The word of God spoke truthful words by the power of the Spirit culminating in authentic authority and involuntary attention on the part of the hears.
The Spirit desires for us to be used in the same way, when we make much of jesus and speak of his truth. A story is told about an preacher in prayer that illiterates the Spirit's importance.
An old country preacher was praying one day, "Dear Lord, give me the unction, give me the unction, give me the unction."
Someone from his congregation overhearing him and asked, "Reverend, what is the unction?"
The tearful old preacher looked up, "I don't know what it is, but I know what it ain't!"
E. M. Bounds, a methodist preacher who gave himself to prayer, preaching and in his later years writing. He wrote 8 books most on pray and most published after his death in 1913. Unlike the preacher above Bounds knew more than what the unction was not. He knew what the unction was and described it in beautiful prose in his book "Power Through Prayer". His "deep well" of experience and understanding comes through his writing as light through a dark room. He writes:
“
Another preacher familiar with the anointing was the Great English preacher Martyn Lloyd-Jones. For him true preaching was much more than a mere intellectual explanation of words in the Bible. Below are two sizable quotes from Lloyd-Jones. In the first quote, he explains the importance of the anointing and relates it to Jesus' own ministry. In the second, he explains the twofold ministry of the Spirit in preaching, in essence what constitute the "work" of the anointing.
The two-fold ministry of the Spirit in preaching, in the preacher and on the listener. Lloyd-Jones explains:
Anointing as Attention holding power
The Holy Spirit has a way of capturing someone's attention and holding it. This is not to be reduced to natural talent, it is a divine work, stronger than Ritalin and infinitely more helpful than Adrenal. I have seen grammar school children deeply attentive to a sermon on Leviticus because of the Spirit's anointing. The anointing grips the soul, invigorates the mind and holds the attention by making truth beautiful and the learning process a palpable experience.
Preaching with such anointing is more an art not a science it comes from the whole person given to the task and open to the spirit. One preacher told me it takes years to learn the rhythm of the Spirit and learn how to march to his tune.
This is not just for preachers, jesus desires Sunday school teachers or small group leaders to ministry in the anointing. One of the most consistently anointed speakers i have experienced was a home group leader. Every time he opened the word it was power and truth, word and spirit, sometime so palpable was the Spirit ministry my heart is moved to worship at the thought of those gatherings.
Application
In our modern, post-reading, A.D.D. culture, where technology and media are the means of holding peoples attention. How can we cultivate a church community flowing in the attention hold unction? What is our responsibility in light of this two-fold ministry? Two group with different responsibilities come to mind. 1.) If you are the speaker then your responsibly are praying for the anointing, long for fresh oil, labor in the word, and over time cultivate the art of bending to the Spirit as you speak. Remember, it is not about you. It's truth and life and the Spirits power, it's about making much of Jesus. 2.) If you are in the pew then pray for the anointing, long for fresh oil, be hungry for God to speak, desire truth as if it were an obsession, a curiosity that you can fully scratch, desiring to know the God revealed in Scripture. Open yourself to be undone by concision and stitched up by the gospel. When such graces mark a congregation and mold a speaker the church is posed to live and minister in Word and Spirit.
End notes
(1) David Martyn Lloyd-Jones, The Christian Soldier: An Exposition of Ephesians 6:10 to 20, Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh; Carlisle, PA, 1977, p.115.
(2) David Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Courageous Christianity, 1st U. S. edition, Crossway Books, Wheaton, IL, 2001, p. 190
So how did Jesus secure the attention of so many? In one sense, it was jesus, magnetic, son of God. Yet Isaiah reminds us jesus was not handsome or physical attractive, like a politician or Fabio. He was a 5'7, tan Jewish man with a stocky build, splinter-scared hands, a big nose and caring smile. (yes, this is hyperbole). It was something deeper than apperance that allowed people to attend to his words in an unforgettable way.
In John 7 we read about the Pharisees sending some officers to arrest Jesus. They made it only as close as they could hear him before deciding to disobey their orders. What happens next gives us insight into the captivating and persuasive power that Jesus commanded. John writes, "The officers then came to the chief priests and Pharisees, who said to them, "Why did you not bring him?" The officers answered, "No one ever spoke like this man!" (v. 45-46).
Their was something about his speech, something so special it could make a soldier forget his mission. I believe, the special element was truth empowered by the Spirit. The anointing on those words captured their attention and derailed them from their purpose. The word of God spoke truthful words by the power of the Spirit culminating in authentic authority and involuntary attention on the part of the hears.
The Spirit desires for us to be used in the same way, when we make much of jesus and speak of his truth. A story is told about an preacher in prayer that illiterates the Spirit's importance.
An old country preacher was praying one day, "Dear Lord, give me the unction, give me the unction, give me the unction."
Someone from his congregation overhearing him and asked, "Reverend, what is the unction?"
The tearful old preacher looked up, "I don't know what it is, but I know what it ain't!"
E. M. Bounds, a methodist preacher who gave himself to prayer, preaching and in his later years writing. He wrote 8 books most on pray and most published after his death in 1913. Unlike the preacher above Bounds knew more than what the unction was not. He knew what the unction was and described it in beautiful prose in his book "Power Through Prayer". His "deep well" of experience and understanding comes through his writing as light through a dark room. He writes:
“
This divine unction is the one distinguishing feature that separates true gospel preaching from all other methods of presenting truth. It backs and interpenetrates the revealed truth with all the force of God. It illumines the Word and broadens and enrichens the intellect and empowers it to grasp and apprehend the Word. It qualifies the preacher’s heart, and brings it to that condition of tenderness, of purity, of force and light that are necessary to secure the highest results. This unction gives to the preacher liberty and enlargement of thought and soul—a freedom, fullness, and directness of utterance that can be secured by no other process.”
Another preacher familiar with the anointing was the Great English preacher Martyn Lloyd-Jones. For him true preaching was much more than a mere intellectual explanation of words in the Bible. Below are two sizable quotes from Lloyd-Jones. In the first quote, he explains the importance of the anointing and relates it to Jesus' own ministry. In the second, he explains the twofold ministry of the Spirit in preaching, in essence what constitute the "work" of the anointing.
“When the Holy Spirit comes in revival there is a great anointing, and it shows itself in many ways. You read of men who had believed the truth, and who were preaching faithfully and regularly, but who were ineffective and lacking in power. Suddenly they are filled with power. They speak with boldness and with power and with great authority. That is the anointing of the Spirit . . . But this anointing is not confined to revival. I use that simply as an illustration. Thank God it is given at other times. Any man who has ever preached should be able to testify to this. There are times when, entirely outside his own control, he is given a special authority, special power, an unction which is unusual. And there are good reasons for its bestowal. There are circumstances which he himself is not always aware of, which he only discovers afterwards. Somebody may have come to the congregation who needed a particular message or word, and the preacher, without knowledge on his part, is guided to say something which is just appropriate to that particular state and condition. There is, therefore, this special enduement of power which is called ‘the anointing’. It is something that one should seek and covet, it is something for which one should be constantly praying . . .
Our Lord was setting out on His public ministry. As the Son of God, He was always full of the Spirit. But in order to do His work He needed a special anointing and He received it at His baptism in the river Jordan by John the Baptist. The Holy Spirit then descended upon Him, He was given this special power. He was God; but as man He needed this ‘baptism’, this ‘anointing’ with the Holy Spirit.” (1)
The two-fold ministry of the Spirit in preaching, in the preacher and on the listener. Lloyd-Jones explains:
“The Holy Spirit enables Christians by giving them what is called in the New Testament “unction”; He gives “anointing,” understanding, freedom, and clarity of speech, an authority. Many terms can be used with respect to this God-given ability to preach. One quotation seems to me to sum it all up very well. Probably the first letter that Paul ever wrote was to the church at Thessalonica, and in the first chapter of the first epistle, he reminds the believers of how the Gospel had come to them: “Our gospel came not unto you in word only, but also in power, and in the Holy Ghost, and in much assurance” (1 Thessalonians 1:5). Paul was saying: “I did the speaking, but it was not I. I was used.” As he was speaking, he knew that he was merely the vehicle, the channel, the instrument that the Holy Spirit was using. He was taken up; he was out of himself; he was, as it were, possessed by the Spirit, and he knew that he was preaching with “much assurance.” Everything was against him. Thessalonica was a pagan city, part of Macedonia. The people did not have a Jewish background or the Old Testament Scriptures; they did not know the prophets; they knew nothing. They were living a life of sin and degradation in utter ignorance, and yet when the apostle appeared among them, he was able to speak with assurance. Why? Because it was not his word only, but he spoke “in power, and in the Holy Ghost.” . . .
The Holy Spirit takes people and helps them to speak in a clear manner . . . That is the way the Holy Spirit works, but there is another—His action upon the listeners. If the Holy Spirit only acted on the preacher, there would be no conversions. The supreme example of the Spirit’s action on the hearers is what happened when Peter was preaching in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost. In Acts 2 we read that halfway through his sermon, as he was expounding the Scriptures, the people “were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, “Men and brethren, what shall we do?” (v. 37). The Holy Spirit did the pricking. It was not Peter’s sermon, which was a straightforward exposition of Scripture. The power, the convicting power of the Holy Spirit, was there working in the listeners. On that day three thousand were added to the church. The beginning of chapter 4 tells us that in the next day or so another two thousand were added.
This, then, is the dual action of the Spirit. He takes the preacher, the speaker, whether in a pulpit or in private, and gives this enabling. Then the Holy Spirit acts upon the ones who are listening and deals with their minds and hearts and wills. Both things happen at the same time.” (2)
Anointing as Attention holding power
The Holy Spirit has a way of capturing someone's attention and holding it. This is not to be reduced to natural talent, it is a divine work, stronger than Ritalin and infinitely more helpful than Adrenal. I have seen grammar school children deeply attentive to a sermon on Leviticus because of the Spirit's anointing. The anointing grips the soul, invigorates the mind and holds the attention by making truth beautiful and the learning process a palpable experience.
Preaching with such anointing is more an art not a science it comes from the whole person given to the task and open to the spirit. One preacher told me it takes years to learn the rhythm of the Spirit and learn how to march to his tune.
This is not just for preachers, jesus desires Sunday school teachers or small group leaders to ministry in the anointing. One of the most consistently anointed speakers i have experienced was a home group leader. Every time he opened the word it was power and truth, word and spirit, sometime so palpable was the Spirit ministry my heart is moved to worship at the thought of those gatherings.
Application
In our modern, post-reading, A.D.D. culture, where technology and media are the means of holding peoples attention. How can we cultivate a church community flowing in the attention hold unction? What is our responsibility in light of this two-fold ministry? Two group with different responsibilities come to mind. 1.) If you are the speaker then your responsibly are praying for the anointing, long for fresh oil, labor in the word, and over time cultivate the art of bending to the Spirit as you speak. Remember, it is not about you. It's truth and life and the Spirits power, it's about making much of Jesus. 2.) If you are in the pew then pray for the anointing, long for fresh oil, be hungry for God to speak, desire truth as if it were an obsession, a curiosity that you can fully scratch, desiring to know the God revealed in Scripture. Open yourself to be undone by concision and stitched up by the gospel. When such graces mark a congregation and mold a speaker the church is posed to live and minister in Word and Spirit.
End notes
(1) David Martyn Lloyd-Jones, The Christian Soldier: An Exposition of Ephesians 6:10 to 20, Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh; Carlisle, PA, 1977, p.115.
(2) David Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Courageous Christianity, 1st U. S. edition, Crossway Books, Wheaton, IL, 2001, p. 190
The teaching method of Jesus (part 3)
Attention
1. Concentration of the mental powers upon an object; a close or careful observing or listening.
Example: The teacher gained the student attention.
2. The ability or power to concentrate mentally.
3. Observant consideration; notice:
Example: Your book has come to our attention.
How did Jesus secure peoples attention? Before we can answer that question we need to ask, what kind of attention did people give Jesus?
There are two main kinds of attention. Attention can be voluntary or involuntary.
1.) By voluntary I mean with effort. It is voluntary because the object attended to is interesting in itself and the subject recognized it as important but tedious. Voluntary attention may be given through power of will, and needs endurance to be fruitful. Such attention should not be seen as bad because it is tedious. Because a subject is personally boring has no bearing on the importance of the information being conveyed.
Voluntary attention may be motivated by fear of consequences, such as if I don't pay attention I may get a bad grade. It can also be moved by an understanding of the importance of the subject being taught. Learning math is often an example of voluntary attention. I maybe wrong but not many people find great joy in the multiplication tables but they can come to recognize the importance of learning them.
2.) By involuntary I mean without a sense of effort to keep interest.
Involuntary attention is given without a sense of effort but enjoys the activity itself. First, The object is interesting to the observer. For example, a person who is enjoying a good book will read until late in the night. Attention is given because of the kind of enjoyment is produces.
Such enjoyment can come from a teacher's presentation, interesting information, the process of learning, or something a little more mysterious. So we ask, what kind of attention was given to Jesus? What kind did his disciples give? What kind did the Pharisees give him? We can be sure Jesus received both kinds of attention. But I think the important question is how did Jesus secure the attention of so many?
Jesus secured attention two practical ways. First because their were many things about him to interest people. Second he knew what to do to get attention.
First, To the people, Jesus was a miracle worker and healer. He was a prophet and rabbi sent from God. We can be sure he was on their radar. He was passionate and caring. He loved the unlovely and was gracious to the legalist. His character was that of God incognito, the incarnate revelation of God. In this respect he was a beautiful person, from the inside out. Such character holds people's attention.
What are some of the things he did to get attention?
1. Sometimes he called for it. "Truly truly, I say unto you," (John 3:3; John 5:24,25; John 6:47; John 12:24)
2. Sometimes he used controversy like the ethical and theological issues between the Pharisees and Sadducees. The debates of his day stirred the curiosity of many and made them attentive to Jesus words.
3. He spoke in concrete language which usually catches and holds the attention.
4. He spoke in imaginative language. He painted pictures with his words much more than connected the dots with abstract logic.
5. He aimed at the heart with his language. He used story's as a way of indirect communication, to uncover the allusive movements of the human heart. The parables in Matt 24 for example spoke successively one story after another, the lost sheep, the lost coin, the lost son, all to make one point.
6. He gave the familiar images and references to explain unfamiliar. He used agricultural terms to explain God's kingdom.
7. Jesus rarely belabored a point. His longest sermon (sermon on the mount) in scripture can be read aloud in lest than 15 mins. Other times we see him minister for several hours. Time just was not an issue for Jesus. What is clear, is that Jesus never wasted His breath in over explaining truth.
8. Jesus wanted people to think. He did not feel the need to spell out everything, so the disciples never had to think. He wanted them to think. He knew thinking facilitates attention, so he sometime asked questions, sometimes made hard sayings (matt 6) and other times left the conversation open ended to force them to reflect.
9. We could say Jesus also received attention because he paid attention. He observed people and understood them with spiritual insight. He was a good listener. He knew what to say that would hook people in because he paid attention to them.
In the next blog we will look at the Spirits role in attention.
In Him
J. Dawson Jarrell
1. Concentration of the mental powers upon an object; a close or careful observing or listening.
Example: The teacher gained the student attention.
2. The ability or power to concentrate mentally.
3. Observant consideration; notice:
Example: Your book has come to our attention.
How did Jesus secure peoples attention? Before we can answer that question we need to ask, what kind of attention did people give Jesus?
There are two main kinds of attention. Attention can be voluntary or involuntary.
1.) By voluntary I mean with effort. It is voluntary because the object attended to is interesting in itself and the subject recognized it as important but tedious. Voluntary attention may be given through power of will, and needs endurance to be fruitful. Such attention should not be seen as bad because it is tedious. Because a subject is personally boring has no bearing on the importance of the information being conveyed.
Voluntary attention may be motivated by fear of consequences, such as if I don't pay attention I may get a bad grade. It can also be moved by an understanding of the importance of the subject being taught. Learning math is often an example of voluntary attention. I maybe wrong but not many people find great joy in the multiplication tables but they can come to recognize the importance of learning them.
2.) By involuntary I mean without a sense of effort to keep interest.
Involuntary attention is given without a sense of effort but enjoys the activity itself. First, The object is interesting to the observer. For example, a person who is enjoying a good book will read until late in the night. Attention is given because of the kind of enjoyment is produces.
Such enjoyment can come from a teacher's presentation, interesting information, the process of learning, or something a little more mysterious. So we ask, what kind of attention was given to Jesus? What kind did his disciples give? What kind did the Pharisees give him? We can be sure Jesus received both kinds of attention. But I think the important question is how did Jesus secure the attention of so many?
Jesus secured attention two practical ways. First because their were many things about him to interest people. Second he knew what to do to get attention.
First, To the people, Jesus was a miracle worker and healer. He was a prophet and rabbi sent from God. We can be sure he was on their radar. He was passionate and caring. He loved the unlovely and was gracious to the legalist. His character was that of God incognito, the incarnate revelation of God. In this respect he was a beautiful person, from the inside out. Such character holds people's attention.
What are some of the things he did to get attention?
1. Sometimes he called for it. "Truly truly, I say unto you," (John 3:3; John 5:24,25; John 6:47; John 12:24)
2. Sometimes he used controversy like the ethical and theological issues between the Pharisees and Sadducees. The debates of his day stirred the curiosity of many and made them attentive to Jesus words.
3. He spoke in concrete language which usually catches and holds the attention.
4. He spoke in imaginative language. He painted pictures with his words much more than connected the dots with abstract logic.
5. He aimed at the heart with his language. He used story's as a way of indirect communication, to uncover the allusive movements of the human heart. The parables in Matt 24 for example spoke successively one story after another, the lost sheep, the lost coin, the lost son, all to make one point.
6. He gave the familiar images and references to explain unfamiliar. He used agricultural terms to explain God's kingdom.
7. Jesus rarely belabored a point. His longest sermon (sermon on the mount) in scripture can be read aloud in lest than 15 mins. Other times we see him minister for several hours. Time just was not an issue for Jesus. What is clear, is that Jesus never wasted His breath in over explaining truth.
8. Jesus wanted people to think. He did not feel the need to spell out everything, so the disciples never had to think. He wanted them to think. He knew thinking facilitates attention, so he sometime asked questions, sometimes made hard sayings (matt 6) and other times left the conversation open ended to force them to reflect.
9. We could say Jesus also received attention because he paid attention. He observed people and understood them with spiritual insight. He was a good listener. He knew what to say that would hook people in because he paid attention to them.
In the next blog we will look at the Spirits role in attention.
In Him
J. Dawson Jarrell
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
The teaching method of Jesus (part 2)
In John 4:1-43 we have Jesus giving an example of personal teaching. For our purposes the text will function as a object lesson in personal teaching. We will take a section of jesus teaching and glean some principles and methods of teaching he utilized. It will gives us a birds-eye view of the subject.
John 4:1-43 - The woman at the well and Jesus, nine observations.
1. Jesus used an occasion before him. You did not let the teachable moment slip by even though he was tired from his journey and he was in the hot noon day sun. It did not dissuade him that she was a Samaritan, a single woman, and on top of that single woman you wouldn't bring home to mama.
2. Jesus establishes a point of contact. He had her attention and interest from the start. He accomplished this by being outlandishly unconventional and by the use of a creative and concrete metaphor.
3. His method was conversational. He did not bust out a pulpit and rattle off three point and a poem or have a organ playing in the background. He taught her in a way that was suitable to the context and approachable.
4. He was here dealing with an individual. While the concept is not touched on in the text. It is true to say that teaching can happen in a crowd but learning is always individual endeavor.
5. He used her natural curiosity as a way for her to be guided towards truth. He asked her no questions other than the icebreaker, "Can I have some water." Yet he answered three of her explicit questions as well as the deepest longing of His nature. Building on her answer he directed her towards a more accurate understanding.
6. Jesus discerned the woman's personal problems. Problems she was not aware. Jesus seemed to be more aware of her problems. His object was to awaken her, first to her sin, then to God's worship and finally to his nature. She begins a religious debate seemingly to distract from our personal issues. Jesus uses His answer to reopen her personal problems, "in spirit and in truth," is a theological answer that touches to the depths of the heart.
7. We can see the use of apperception when Jesus uses physical water to talk about spiritual living water. Apperception is a mental process where a person make sense of an idea by assimilating it into a body of ideas that they already possess. It is not just a cool analogy but something that makes sense with in the context of the Samaritan woman's life.
8. Jesus use of motivation appears in a four-step process of the Samaritan woman's awakening. The four step process went from interest and then conscience and towards worship and finally of service. Jesus spoke of water and awaking her interest. He spoke of husbands and awaken her conscience. He spoke up God's heart and awoken the impulse to worship. Finally he revealed his nature and awoken a desire for service.
9. In the story the characteristics of Jesus as a good teacher are evident. For example, he appears in this incident to disregard the current conventional issues. For the sake of teaching the women Jesus was willing to go against racial prejudice of his day and talk with the Samaritan woman. He taught with the absence of false modesty. He had an intimate knowledge of his pupil and a proficiency in the subject he was teaching.
John 4:1-43 - The woman at the well and Jesus, nine observations.
1. Jesus used an occasion before him. You did not let the teachable moment slip by even though he was tired from his journey and he was in the hot noon day sun. It did not dissuade him that she was a Samaritan, a single woman, and on top of that single woman you wouldn't bring home to mama.
2. Jesus establishes a point of contact. He had her attention and interest from the start. He accomplished this by being outlandishly unconventional and by the use of a creative and concrete metaphor.
3. His method was conversational. He did not bust out a pulpit and rattle off three point and a poem or have a organ playing in the background. He taught her in a way that was suitable to the context and approachable.
4. He was here dealing with an individual. While the concept is not touched on in the text. It is true to say that teaching can happen in a crowd but learning is always individual endeavor.
5. He used her natural curiosity as a way for her to be guided towards truth. He asked her no questions other than the icebreaker, "Can I have some water." Yet he answered three of her explicit questions as well as the deepest longing of His nature. Building on her answer he directed her towards a more accurate understanding.
6. Jesus discerned the woman's personal problems. Problems she was not aware. Jesus seemed to be more aware of her problems. His object was to awaken her, first to her sin, then to God's worship and finally to his nature. She begins a religious debate seemingly to distract from our personal issues. Jesus uses His answer to reopen her personal problems, "in spirit and in truth," is a theological answer that touches to the depths of the heart.
7. We can see the use of apperception when Jesus uses physical water to talk about spiritual living water. Apperception is a mental process where a person make sense of an idea by assimilating it into a body of ideas that they already possess. It is not just a cool analogy but something that makes sense with in the context of the Samaritan woman's life.
8. Jesus use of motivation appears in a four-step process of the Samaritan woman's awakening. The four step process went from interest and then conscience and towards worship and finally of service. Jesus spoke of water and awaking her interest. He spoke of husbands and awaken her conscience. He spoke up God's heart and awoken the impulse to worship. Finally he revealed his nature and awoken a desire for service.
9. In the story the characteristics of Jesus as a good teacher are evident. For example, he appears in this incident to disregard the current conventional issues. For the sake of teaching the women Jesus was willing to go against racial prejudice of his day and talk with the Samaritan woman. He taught with the absence of false modesty. He had an intimate knowledge of his pupil and a proficiency in the subject he was teaching.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
The teaching method of Jesus
As Christians we know we are to be like Jesus. It is no different when it
comes to the teaching office in the church, we should teach like Jesus. Many look at what Jesus taught but few have looked at how Jesus taught. His techniques, methods and understanding of the education process is evident throughout the gospels. While ultimately all learning is the work of God's Spirit it does not negate diligently learning how to be a more effective teacher. My hope in these blogs is that our saviors teaching method helps someone be a better teacher.
Lets us begin by looking at the subject of education from a wide view lens. The context in which all educational endeavors take place is called the teaching situation. The teaching situation involves six essential elements.
1. a teacher
2. a pupil or pupils
3. An environment: examples include a classroom, laboratory, library, apparatus, even a person's social context.
4. Curriculum: the things taught
5. The aim of the teacher: that which the teacher would accomplish by means of instruction in the life of the pupil.
6. Method, or the Way of the process.
Example from Jesus's ministry to see if we can find the teaching situations in the story.
A.) The story of Jesus and Nicodemus in John 3.
1. teacher: Jesus
2. pupil: Nicodemus
3. Environment: night scene
4. Curriculum: the subject of the instruction is "the birth from above."
5. Aim: jesus aimed to affect change in the life of the pupil. (Did jesus accomplish his aim? see John 7:50, 19:39)
6. The method: conversation - dialogue including question and answer, concrete illustration of the work of the Spirit, and explanation.
In many other areas Jesus understand the teaching situation and uses it with great skill to accomplish his aim in teaching. The teaching situations helps us see all the aspects that are involved in learning. Assessing the teaching situation with accuracy is important in using the right method for the situation and the good of the pupil.
Tuesday, November 08, 2011
Album review: "Ghost on the Canvas" by Glen Campbell
I just finished Glen Campbell's new album, "Ghost on the Canvas" now I am not a country fan and I would not have never bought the album had it not been for two factors. One, it was recommend to me by a good friend and two the back story behind the album. I will tell you about the second, Ghost on the Canvas is intended to be his farewell album due to his diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. In light of this the songs take on a gravity given the southern wordsmith wrote them as a goodbye and in light of the disease that will take him before he is gone.
His Faith
I am often very cynical when it comes to public professions of faith by celebrities, maybe to my own shame yet Campbell is the real deal.
Campbell made public his commitment to Christianity nearly 20 years ago. Since, he has evidenced persevering grace and been something of a picture of what Jesus can do with a strung out country singer. In his autobiography, Rhinestone Cowboy, (yep, he wrote that song) Campbell chronicles his life and its near-destruction. He tells the gritty and hard facts of his decent into alcoholism and drugs and of his convention to Christianity. Looking into it, I found out He is an active member in his home church, North Phoenix Baptist Church.
His Music
It is with that back story in mind, I soaked in the melancholy praise of a man world wise but Christ longing. The song vary in content but are never far from a spiritual core. Musically, i was impressed. It is not 70's steel guitars and yodeling. I think it would appeal to hipsters as well as men my dad's age.The interludes between songs weave all the song together into a harmonic whole (reminiscent of the beach boys Pet sounds- I love that album). The lyrics are rich with meaning and almost haunting much like the feeling you get from the whole album. It is a bittersweet goodbye that is purely melancholy yet hope is always just below the surface bubbling up in moment a slow guitar wines and lyrical honesty.
Songs like
"A Better Place"
"It's Your Amazing Grace"
"Hold On Hope"
"Strong"
"There's No Me... Without You"
Give thoughtful and thankful reflections on his condition, his relationships and his past. It is odd to say good by before you really should but Campbell has made this country boy tear with pride at a Christian who knows how to bow out with praise on his lips and most assuredly die well with grace leading the way.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
His Faith
I am often very cynical when it comes to public professions of faith by celebrities, maybe to my own shame yet Campbell is the real deal.
Campbell made public his commitment to Christianity nearly 20 years ago. Since, he has evidenced persevering grace and been something of a picture of what Jesus can do with a strung out country singer. In his autobiography, Rhinestone Cowboy, (yep, he wrote that song) Campbell chronicles his life and its near-destruction. He tells the gritty and hard facts of his decent into alcoholism and drugs and of his convention to Christianity. Looking into it, I found out He is an active member in his home church, North Phoenix Baptist Church.
His Music
It is with that back story in mind, I soaked in the melancholy praise of a man world wise but Christ longing. The song vary in content but are never far from a spiritual core. Musically, i was impressed. It is not 70's steel guitars and yodeling. I think it would appeal to hipsters as well as men my dad's age.The interludes between songs weave all the song together into a harmonic whole (reminiscent of the beach boys Pet sounds- I love that album). The lyrics are rich with meaning and almost haunting much like the feeling you get from the whole album. It is a bittersweet goodbye that is purely melancholy yet hope is always just below the surface bubbling up in moment a slow guitar wines and lyrical honesty.
Songs like
"A Better Place"
"It's Your Amazing Grace"
"Hold On Hope"
"Strong"
"There's No Me... Without You"
Give thoughtful and thankful reflections on his condition, his relationships and his past. It is odd to say good by before you really should but Campbell has made this country boy tear with pride at a Christian who knows how to bow out with praise on his lips and most assuredly die well with grace leading the way.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Flavel on Providence
Today, I digested a bit of an English Puritan. I am not speaking of cannibalism but contemplation. The book was John Flavel's work, "Mystery of Providence". Flavel was an English Puritan and Non-conformist, born 1627 and died 1691. I often go back to him when the clouds of this world blur and blind my vision, stealing the warm light of hope, leaving only the cold comfort and squinty vision of melancholy to sustain me.
Here are some quotes from what I read today. The first illuminates unbelief as the first enemy we face in times of distress. He shows how unbelief is known by the way it calls God's good will into question and guides us to distrust his providence. Flavel writes:
The quotes below are just a few more gems from Flavel's pen that sparked faith, life and trust in my heart.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Here are some quotes from what I read today. The first illuminates unbelief as the first enemy we face in times of distress. He shows how unbelief is known by the way it calls God's good will into question and guides us to distrust his providence. Flavel writes:
“Unbelief queries the will of God, and questions whether He will now be gracious, though He has been so formerly. If troubles or dangers grow to a height and we see nothing but ruin and misery in the eye of reason before us, now unbelief becomes importunate and troublesome to the soul. Now where are your prayers, your hopes, yea, where is now your God?” Unbelief maintains the impossibility of relief in deep distresses.
'Can God furnish a table in the wilderness? ... Can he give bread also? Can he provide flesh for his people?' Psalm 78:19-20.
Oh vile and unworthy thoughts of God which proceed from our measuring the immense and boundless power of God by our own line and measure ... because we do not see which way relief should come."
The quotes below are just a few more gems from Flavel's pen that sparked faith, life and trust in my heart.
“All the dark, intricate, puzzling providences at which we were sometimes so offended…we shall [one day] see to be to us, as the difficult passage through the wilderness was to Israel, ‘the right way to the city of habitation’.”
"Whatsoever we have over-loved, idolized, and leaned upon, God has from time to time broken it, and made us to see the vanity of it; so that we find the readiest course to be rid our comforts is to set our hearts inordinately or immoderately upon them."
“[Providences] often puzzle and entangle our thoughts, but bring them to the Word, and your duty will be quickly manifested. “Until I went into the sanctuary of God, then understood I their end” (Ps. 73:17). And not only their end, but his own duty, to be quiet in an afflicted condition and not envy their prosperity.”
“You may look upon some providences once and again, and see little or nothing in them, but look “seven times,” that is, meditate often upon them, and you will see their increasing glory, like that increasing cloud (1 Kings 18:44).”
"When our needs are permitted to grow to an extremity, and all visible hopes fail, then to have relief given wonderfully enhances the price of such a mercy (Isa. 41:17-18)."
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Monday, August 22, 2011
Good video on importance of theology
This video from Joshua Harris to promote his book dug down deep.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
DugDownDeep_Carnahan.mov from Covenant Life Church on Vimeo.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
The unavoidable reality of theology
As far back as I can remember, back In the days when MTV actually played videos, people told
me theology was useless. I thought, nobody needs dry and dusty theology. I like most westerners, I thought theology was an academic exercise whereby a group of people sit in an ivory tower and debate over ancient documents that have no relevancy for today. I was wrong.Theology is an inevitable activity of humanity. But as LaVar Burton of Reading Rainbow fame, (Yes, La Forge from Star Trek: next gen.) always said, "Don't take my word for it!"
Who really needs theology?
Answer:
“Many things can be meant by the word ‘God.’ For this reason, there are many kinds of theologies. There is no man who does not have his own god or gods as the object of his highest desire and trust, or as the basis of his deepest loyalty and commitment. There is no one who is not to this extent also a theologian. There is, moreover, no religion, no philosophy, no world view that is not dedicated to some such divinity. Every world view, even that disclosed in the Swiss and American national anthems, presupposes a divinity interpreted in one way or another and worshipped to some degree, whether wholeheartedly or superficially. There is no philosophy that is not to some extent also theology. Not only does this fact apply to philosophers who desire to affirm—or who, at least, are ready to admit—that divinity, in a positive sense, is the essence of truth and power of some kind of highest principle; but the same truth is valid even for thinkers denying such a divinity, for such a denial would in practice merely consist in transferring an identical dignity and function to another object. Such an alternative object might be ‘nature,’ creativity, or an unconscious and amorphous will to life. It might also be ‘reason,’ progress, or even a redeeming nothingness into which man would be destined to disappear. Even such apparently ‘godless’ ideologies are theologies.” (Karl Barth, Evangelical Theology: An Introduction, pp. 3-4)
Therefore:
“What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us. The history of mankind will probably show that no people has ever risen above its religion, and man’s spiritual history will positively demonstrate that no religion has ever been greater than its idea of God. Worship is pure or base as the worshiper entertains high or low thoughts of God. For this reason the gravest question before the Church is always God Himself, and the most portentous fact about any man is not what he at a given time may say or do, but what he in his deep heart conceives God to be like. We tend by a secret law of the soul to move toward our mental image of God. This is true not only of the individual Christian, but of the company of Christians that composes the Church. Always the most revealing thing about the Church is her idea of God.” (A. W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy, p. 1)
Conclusion:
“Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15)
Indeed: "Theology is not undesirable, it is unavoidable. What matters is that it should be good theology." (Trevor Hart, Faith Thinking: The Dynamics of Christian Theology, p. 7)
Some things are inevitability. My mom tells me death and taxes top the list. I have found if a Toronto hits a trailer park it is inevitable a the local news team will interview someone with poor dental hygiene and a rudimentary grasp of the English language. Theological thinking is an inevitable activity. So how we feel about theology does not matter. We already do whether we want to admit it or not. So as a Christian our first question is not, why do it but "Do I have good theology?"
Indeed-E-Du: "We're either building our lives on the reality of what God is truly like and what he's about, or we're basing our lives on our own imagination and misconceptions... We're all theologians. The question is whether what we know about God is true." (Joshua Harris, Dug Down Deep, p. 3)

Who really needs theology?
Answer:
“Many things can be meant by the word ‘God.’ For this reason, there are many kinds of theologies. There is no man who does not have his own god or gods as the object of his highest desire and trust, or as the basis of his deepest loyalty and commitment. There is no one who is not to this extent also a theologian. There is, moreover, no religion, no philosophy, no world view that is not dedicated to some such divinity. Every world view, even that disclosed in the Swiss and American national anthems, presupposes a divinity interpreted in one way or another and worshipped to some degree, whether wholeheartedly or superficially. There is no philosophy that is not to some extent also theology. Not only does this fact apply to philosophers who desire to affirm—or who, at least, are ready to admit—that divinity, in a positive sense, is the essence of truth and power of some kind of highest principle; but the same truth is valid even for thinkers denying such a divinity, for such a denial would in practice merely consist in transferring an identical dignity and function to another object. Such an alternative object might be ‘nature,’ creativity, or an unconscious and amorphous will to life. It might also be ‘reason,’ progress, or even a redeeming nothingness into which man would be destined to disappear. Even such apparently ‘godless’ ideologies are theologies.” (Karl Barth, Evangelical Theology: An Introduction, pp. 3-4)
Therefore:
“What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us. The history of mankind will probably show that no people has ever risen above its religion, and man’s spiritual history will positively demonstrate that no religion has ever been greater than its idea of God. Worship is pure or base as the worshiper entertains high or low thoughts of God. For this reason the gravest question before the Church is always God Himself, and the most portentous fact about any man is not what he at a given time may say or do, but what he in his deep heart conceives God to be like. We tend by a secret law of the soul to move toward our mental image of God. This is true not only of the individual Christian, but of the company of Christians that composes the Church. Always the most revealing thing about the Church is her idea of God.” (A. W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy, p. 1)
Conclusion:
“Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15)
Indeed: "Theology is not undesirable, it is unavoidable. What matters is that it should be good theology." (Trevor Hart, Faith Thinking: The Dynamics of Christian Theology, p. 7)
Some things are inevitability. My mom tells me death and taxes top the list. I have found if a Toronto hits a trailer park it is inevitable a the local news team will interview someone with poor dental hygiene and a rudimentary grasp of the English language. Theological thinking is an inevitable activity. So how we feel about theology does not matter. We already do whether we want to admit it or not. So as a Christian our first question is not, why do it but "Do I have good theology?"
Indeed-E-Du: "We're either building our lives on the reality of what God is truly like and what he's about, or we're basing our lives on our own imagination and misconceptions... We're all theologians. The question is whether what we know about God is true." (Joshua Harris, Dug Down Deep, p. 3)
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Thoughts on a Rapper's life, love, and unlikely redemption.
If you like/love Run DMC you must listen to this.
If you like/love Sarah Mclachlan you must listen to this.
If your life has been touched in any way by adoption, you definitely must listen to this.
Rap star Darryl ‘DMC’ McDaniels from the groundbreaking rap group Run DMC tells a fascinating, hilarious and touching story about singer/songwriter Sarah Mclachlan saving him from suicide.
While on tour in Europe during a reflective "what's it all about" "why am i here?" period. During this time he began struggling with impulsive and consistent suicidal thoughts. It was at this time heard the song "angle" by McLachlan. Something in him called to him that life was worth living. He ran to the music store and got all things McLachlan. Beginning an obsession with her music that would last for years. He clammed that the songs spoke to him and inspired him to want to live. DMC later found out that he was adopted and the pieces of his forlorn heart began to reshape. McLachlan and DMC ended up making a song together about his journey. He ends his story with McLachlan own revelation as she tells him she was adopted as well.
The whole story with all it's twists and turns is really pretty amazing. The threads of redemption run through the whole of his story. Rappers are modern storytellers, the best on par with homer and Wordsworth. I now have a whole new level of respect for Mr. McDaniels and his hilarious and brutally honest storytelling abilities.
His story reminds me of the truth that the human heart has longings deeper than this reality. We all have orphaned hearts and through a song or story we feel the longing for purpose, for life, for more. Often through other adopted souls we connect to the life we so deeply thirst for and are given grace for the moment.
His story also reminded me of the joy of friendship. Sometimes in times of need we find in others a harmony intangible but unrelenting. Heaven draws us high, away from destructive forces and into the purity of well worn paths. We experience friendship only to find commonalities linking us in places of our deepest and most hidden truths. Truths that define us and remind us why we are alive.
Hear him tell at the moth pod cast from NPR - 01-Darryl-_DMC_-McDaniels_-Angel.mp3
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
If you like/love Sarah Mclachlan you must listen to this.
If your life has been touched in any way by adoption, you definitely must listen to this.

While on tour in Europe during a reflective "what's it all about" "why am i here?" period. During this time he began struggling with impulsive and consistent suicidal thoughts. It was at this time heard the song "angle" by McLachlan. Something in him called to him that life was worth living. He ran to the music store and got all things McLachlan. Beginning an obsession with her music that would last for years. He clammed that the songs spoke to him and inspired him to want to live. DMC later found out that he was adopted and the pieces of his forlorn heart began to reshape. McLachlan and DMC ended up making a song together about his journey. He ends his story with McLachlan own revelation as she tells him she was adopted as well.

His story reminds me of the truth that the human heart has longings deeper than this reality. We all have orphaned hearts and through a song or story we feel the longing for purpose, for life, for more. Often through other adopted souls we connect to the life we so deeply thirst for and are given grace for the moment.
His story also reminded me of the joy of friendship. Sometimes in times of need we find in others a harmony intangible but unrelenting. Heaven draws us high, away from destructive forces and into the purity of well worn paths. We experience friendship only to find commonalities linking us in places of our deepest and most hidden truths. Truths that define us and remind us why we are alive.
Hear him tell at the moth pod cast from NPR - 01-Darryl-_DMC_-McDaniels_-Angel.mp3
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Friday, June 24, 2011
Loosing my religion

A Facebook friend requested myself,( and many others) to meditate on a text from the book of Hebrews. The reflections for me blossomed
way beyond a little blurb.
Hebrews 13:9-16
9 Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings, for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them. 10 We have an altar from which those who serve the tent have no right to eat. 11 For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp.12 So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood.
13 Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured. 14 For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come.
15 Through him then let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name. 16 Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.
Interpretation of Hebrews 13:9-16
The writer is contrasting aspects of the jewish sacrificial system and over all religious system with Jesus, making applications at particular points along the way. In short, Jesus is better than the old system, with its legalism and ritualism. They are to come out from all fleshy formalism, and mere ritualistic external "going thought the movements" worship (personified by the city of Jerusalem) that lacks heart felt intentions and hope filled vision through the worship of Jesus.
What is a southern boy to do?
Answer: Walk out on religion.. and into Jesus.
It is often a messy brake up but it must be done. Religion is no good for a Christian. Christianity is a relationship with God through Jesus not a save yourself religion of rules and heartless actions. Anytime a human seeks to win God's approval or smooth over his anger with some religious activities and profanatory worship we commit a deeper sin more deceptive and deadly than the ones we attempt to atone.
Application: How we walk away from religion.
1. Say good bye to legalism - Heb. 13:9–11
The concern appears to be doctrines about foods. They where splitting hairs over the dietary laws and temple sacrifices. The writers argument is basically 1. Such legalism is opposite to grace. 2. Where the spiritual benefit in such legalism. 3. the Christian altar is better than the food of the tabernacle. Unlike most OT offerings, the sin offering from the Day of Atonement could not be eaten by the tabernacle priests. It was burned outside the camp. However, all Christians partake of the Christian altar (Jesus' sacrifice). Jesus went to the place of sacrificial animals. Jesus' sufferings and death render his people holy. The food of the tabernacle makes no one holy. But to the legalists such food debates where central for they majored on the minor and obsessed over the obscure. Legalism takes many forms, the form behind the text in hebrews is called majoring on the minors legalism. The legalists fueled by their Jewish traditions, confused by obsessive thinking and driven by their legalistic assumptions lost sight of Christ and missed the point of the whole system; to wittiness to Christ. In short: don't do that! We must always keep the main thing the main thing ( 1 Cor 15:1-4). Keep the gospel central and center yourself in the gospel.
2. Say good bye to seeking the approval of others. V 12-13
The writer uses the idea of outside the camp in a metaphorical way to speaks of leaving behind the pesky desire for the approval of other. Seeking first the approval of God by embracing the reproach of Christ, emulating Jesus' response to his shameful sufferings (see Heb 12:2–3). We are to be committed to the cause in life until death, with our eyes fixed on Jesus and no one else.
3. Say hello to hope that fills us with life (v.14).
The power to live is not the will to power but the hope of faith. We are to look beyond this world, with it's "save yourself" check list systems of religion and the self-help theories of righteousness and find the power to live in the hope of a sure home. When the writer speaks of the city that is to come (v.14) it is an application and allusion to the Abraham's ability to let hope be his vision. (see Heb 11:9-10, 14–16). Christian endurance is founded on a realization that this world is a mere temporary dwelling we are on journey toward the eternal home. to the degree we see and long for our sure home is the degree we can endure the tribulations in this life.
4. Say hello to thankful service (v.15-16)
The writer describes three sacrifices we as priest of the new convent are to offer God. 1. Praise, 2. doing good, and 3. being a giver. These sacrifices minister to God. Our lifestyle is a ministers to the heart of God. We make God smile like a proud papa when we offering honest thankful praise to Jesus (Jesus revealed God's name, see John 17:6, 26). When we praise Jesus, the Father smiles and says something like, "that my child!" So, praising Jesus, doing good and being a giver (not a taker or hoarder) ministers to God. We touch his heart, not by jumping through religious hoops (like not missing sunday school) or doing special rituals (like a summer mission trip). Our lifestyle is not motivated by fear of punishment, or the guilt of obligation. Our life is motivated by the freedom of grace and the sure reality of redemption. We live thankful for jesus did it all for us. So we Praise Jesus in word and deed. We do good to all regardless of their actions to us. We are to be radical givers of ourselves, and our resources.
Three priestly functions apply named sacrifices for they all take guts. But think of their effect (v16) They please the one who made the universe. God looked at his creation in its newness and called it good. He looks at our sacrifices as mixed and impure as they are and he smiles for his heart is pleased. How is this? Our sacrifices unlike the jewish system are not payment for sin but a response to the sin bearing sacrifice of Jesus. We let our sacrifices rise from the "thank you" redemption has sown into our hearts and he is pleased. By them "through jesus" (v15) we can make God's heart jump for joy, like a proud parent smiles with pleasure at the fumbling of a child learning to walk so God response to us. We don't have to be perfect. We will fall and fumble but because it is "through Jesus" we will not fail to warm his heart.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Thursday, April 07, 2011
God of our Valleys and our Mountains
Visual aid - [a large 3” rope with multiple knots ]
Intro.
This sermon rises from the battles and joys, my wife and I have recently experienced and are still walking out. So I preach more to myself than anything. Today, we will look at how God is in control of all the turns and twists in the knots of life. We look at how he uses them for our good and his glory. We will look at what he requires of us. We will look at four passages of Scripture to get a grasp on what God is doing when life gets tied in knots.
Outline - Five points on faith: 1.) The peaks and valleys of faith, 2.) The Place of faith, 3.) A Person of faith, 4.) A Picture of faith, 5.) The Promise of faith
Let's pray! (prayer)
I have learned - Life can be like a battle.
The battles we face are often intense times of weakness, distress, and confusion; The low points of our life. Yet God is with us during difficulties. In fact, these valleys are often as much the plan of God as our mountaintop experiences. We all need to hear the truth; Christ is God of more than just the mountains.
1.) The peaks and valleys of faith
GOD of more than just the mountains
1 kings 20 speaks plainly to this truth. Israel had recently defeated the Syrians in a mountain battle. In 1 Kings 20:22-23 we read:
22 Then the prophet came near to the king of Israel and said to him, "Come, strengthen yourself, and consider well what you have to do, for in the spring the king of Syria will come up against you." 23 And the servants of the king of Syria said to him, "Their gods are gods of the hills, and so they were stronger than we. But let us fight against them in the plain, and surely we shall be stronger than they.-
28 And a man of God came near and said to the king of Israel, "Thus says the LORD, 'Because the Syrians have said, "The LORD is a god of the hills but he is not a god of the valleys," therefore I will give all this great multitude into your hand, and you shall know that I am the LORD.'"
APP: No matter what the enemy tries to tell you, Christ is God of the mountains and God of the valleys. He has not stopped being God because you happen to be in a valley. In and through all things He is our God, in the valley and on the mountain. In your life, is God, just the God of the mountain or is he also the God of your valleys? Faith is easy on the mountain but we often need to be reminded God is in control in the valleys as well.
A. God has different purposes for each place.
Mountains and valleys in contrast
a.) When we are on the "mountaintops", we can see our future clearly. We have perspective and confidence.
ILL: my experience of being on the Macedonian Mountain top: the beauty of the view and how far you could see. On top of the mountain was a giant steal cross, from the mountain top experience of redemption we see life with greater clarity.
b.) When we are in one of life's valleys, our vision is limited and our future seems hidden. Yet valleys are also the most fertile places on earth. Valleys produce fruitfulness. The mountain is not the place you plant crops. You don't farm on a mountain top, you farm in the valley.
ILL: The Macedonian Mountain overlooked the city of Skopje. The mountain was great but life was in the valley. You could see the city far below. Cars like ants moved through vein like roads making the city sparkle and teem with the signs of life.
APP: Whether we are experiencing the height of success, blessing and power or are in a valley of weakness and despair, the Lord is our God continually, in the valleys and the mountains.
2.) The Place of faith
In psalms 84, the psalmist writes on the journey of every human heart.
5 Blessed are those whose strength is in you, in whose heart are the highways to Zion. 6 As they go through the Valley of Baca they make it a place of springs; -Psalm 84:5-6
A few observations
• God has placed in our hearts "highways to Zion," - meaning God places in man's heart by His Holy Spirit, a desire to Worship The Holy One. Placed within every believer is an eternal longing in our hearts for God. It is a holy longing - a desire never satisfied on this side of heaven. Hope burning bright with hunger and longing for the object our hope is turned towards - the Living God. This heart highway is an O.T. picture of a regenerated heart of faith.
• Hearts will go through the valley of Baca. Baca means "weeping." Each of us has times of weeping when our hearts and hopes seem crushed. But we pass through valleys; we do not live in them.
• God redeems our valleys and makes them springs. We All will "Pass through the valley of Baca..." Once we are on the other side of weeping, God makes our valley experience into "a spring." The very things that overwhelmed us will, in time, refresh us with new life. Remember, God never waists our pain.
APP: Do not forget, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Even the hairs on your head are numbered. He cares. God never waits our pain. It is His love for us that redeems our hardships and not only brings good out of what was meant for evil, but also trains us to deliver others.
3.) The Person of faith
Jesus is our object of faith:
Turn to Hebrews 5:7-9, it reads:
7 In the days of his flesh, Jesus offered up prayers and supplications, with loud cries and tears, to him who was able to save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverence. 8 Although he was a son, he learned obedience through what he suffered. 9 And being made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him, - Hebrews 5:7-9
The writer of Hebrews reminds us that even Jesus had to go through valleys. He lived a sin-less life but it was not without suffering. Part of His training involved suffering. Yet His suffering was the Father's means of acquainting Him with the actual feelings of mankind's need and pain. Because He suffered what we suffer, He is able to serve as a faithful high priest.
APP: Hard times are hard! Jesus understands our suffering - he has walked the same valleys. We have a Savior who understands. This makes trusting faith much easier for we trust a Savior who can say to us the honest word, “I understand, I have been there too.” We place our faith in someone who has been there and understands the process.
If we trust Him and yield to God's plan for Christ to be formed in us, (Rom 8:29) God will take our sorrows and enlarge our hearts to contain the glory of heaven. Once we have been acquainted with grief, and taught by that grief, we will then walk in Jesus-like compassion to help others in their grief. We only need to learn to yield to grace and trust God is making us more like Jesus.
4.) A Picture of faith
A picture of yielding: The life of Joseph
Joseph's life is a pattern for many who have had a genuine call from God. When Joseph was young, he was given a dream of God's plan for him. (mountain) Joseph was betrayed by his brothers, thrown in a pit (valley) sold into slavery then rose to prominence from slavery in Potiphar's house. (Mountain) He was unjustly accused by that hussy, known as Potiphar's wife. He was imprisoned and forgotten by all except God. (valley)
God patiently watched and measured Joseph's responses to difficulty. Joseph knew God was in charge of the valleys as well as the mountains. Rich or poor, blessed or smitten, Joseph served God.
The Lord suddenly connected all the loose ends of Joseph's life. Everything that Joseph went through would have seemed cruel and unfair except that the Lord was shaping a man for His purpose.
APP: Our walk with God may also have begun with Big dreams and clear visions where God wants to take us. Yet we fail to be able to see how His promises will come to pass in our lives. God uses everything we go through for future purposes that He alone sees. We do not see His ultimate plan while we are in the valley. We must remember the vision, keeping faith in what God has promised.
5.) The Promise of faith
Joseph's retrospect look - a promise of hope in every valley.
Scripture tells us that during the birth of his children, Joseph took a moment to look back at his journey. The names that came from his retrospective are telling of what God did for Joseph.
"Joseph named the firstborn Manasseh, 'For,' he said, 'God has made me forget all my trouble and all my father's household'" (Genesis 41:51). God caused Joseph to forget the difficulty and pain of his life.
APP: There is something wonderful about the Lord's capacity to cause all things to work for good. With Jesus in our lives, a time ultimately comes when God causes us to forget all the troubles of the past.
"He named the second Ephraim, 'For,' he said, 'God has made me fruitful in the land of my affliction'" (Genesis 41:52). God made him fruitful in the very things that afflicted him.
APP: In the land of your affliction, in your battle, is the place where God will make you fruitful.
Consider your area of greatest affliction.
• In that area God will make you fruitful in such a way that your heart will be fully satisfied and God's heart fully glorified.
• God has not promised to keep us from valleys and sufferings, but He has promised to make us fruitful in them.
Without a doubt we each will pass through valleys, our hearts are made for them. Remember, As we remain faithful to Him in trials, the character and nature of Jesus will be formed in us. Christ will be revealed to those around us. This is his plan God intends to make your life the Spring others gain strength from as they traverse their own valleys.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
SEAM REDEEMED
SEAM REDEEMED: Welcome to the Church of What Not to Wear
by Karen Swallow Prior
No, I’m not talking about the get-ups of the folks gathered at the summer tent revival held behind the used car lot. I’m talking about the phenomenon of The Learning Channel’s What Not to Wear. (Full disclosure: I am one of the faithful.)
In case you’ve been living under a rock or don’t get cable, What Not to Wear (based on a British show of the same name) is an hour-long “reality show” in which one of the fashion-fallen among us is secretly nominated by a concerned loved one, filmed surreptitiously for two weeks, then accosted by the show’s two hosts and fashion experts, Clinton Kelly and Stacy London. In exchange for a $5,000 shopping spree, the nominee must agree to surrender her old wardrobe and submit to a litany of fashion rules set by London and Kelly.
Behind the show’s long-running success (the US version has been on the air since 2003) is a formula as old as story itself, a pattern that includes the elements of any well-told story, as well as the one ingredient essential to any great story: redemption.
The True Quest
The protagonist of each What Not to Wear narrative is a reluctant heroine facing numerous obstacles in what superficially appears to be a rather shallow quest: to spend $5,000 on a new wardrobe that adheres to the new style rules. As with every quest, antagonists abound: the person who nominated the subject for the show (a friend, co-worker, or family member); the show’s benevolent but stern hosts London and Kelly; and the scissors-wielding and lipstick-bearing hair and make-up artists responsible for the final touches in the heroine’s transformation.
In any great story, however, the real quest turns out to be something altogether different from the ostensible one, something deeper and far more significant. In the Arthurian legends, for example, the quest for the Holy Grail is actually a quest for kinship in the face of all that threatens the community of the Round Table; in Great Expectations, Pip’s quest to become a gentleman according to his false definition becomes instead a quest to become a true gentleman; in Fight Club, the unnamed narrator’s quest to overcome depression and insomnia is really a quest for a unified sense of self in a depersonalized, commodified society. You get the idea. Likewise, in every episode of What Not to Wear, the true quest for the heroine always turns out to be much more than the merely sartorial.
In each segment, the central conflict ultimately is not with the show’s hosts, the conspiratorial nominator, or even the subject’s requisite battle with her (or his, but usually her) own physical imperfections, be they great or small. Rather, the true struggle is always the inner one. In episode after episode, the subject’s refusal to dress appropriately or attractively (or both) is rooted deep in the psyche and not in the surface-level external circumstances, be these financial distress, work challenges, parental responsibilities, or other personal difficulties.
Inner Battles
The documentary style of the show includes snippets of the subject’s thoughts at each stage of the makeover, and these invariably move through the same emotional arc: from nervous anticipation, to annoyance with London and Kelly and doubt over the new “rules,” to the inevitable breakthrough—that moment when the proselyte confronts (often tearfully) her real issue, be it low self-esteem, self-loathing, or the fear of growing up and accepting a real woman’s body. The battle against the body always turns out to be merely a cover for the battle against inner demons.
The following are typical of the battles faced on episodes of TLC’s What Not to Wear:
• Bailey is a 32-year-old who “recently lost 60 pounds but still hasn’t accepted her new body.”
• Teresa “never felt beautiful” and “chose comfort over style, with sack dresses and oversized tops.”
• Disa “was in a mid-life style crisis” and had “been looking for the fountain of youth in her tween daughter’s closet, often wearing bright-colored jumpers, striped leggings and silly hats” as a walking fashion “playground.”
• Tamara is “a single mom who knew only one word when it came to style: sexy. Her wardrobe went from unflattering and clingy at work to skin tight and almost uncovered at night!”
• Lexa is “a 30-year-old Red Cross employee” and “one of the biggest challenges London and Kelly ever faced. Her ‘librarian meets French maid’ style had gotten her written up at work.”
The “after” state of Lexa—achieved, according to the website, once “London and Kelly helped her overcome her abrasive and defensive attitude and achieve a true life change”—exemplifies the total transformation that typifies each show. And “total” refers not simply to the addition of hair and makeup improvements to the new wardrobe, but rather to an inner, as well as outer, change.
Clothes Matter
Of course, every good story has a significant theme. And the show’s theme—that clothes matter—is also what makes the show work. For whatever else they might be or represent, clothes serve as a constant reminder of humanity’s need, as explained in the Judeo-Christian tradition, arising out of the Fall, to have our sin “covered.” We see this in what Genesis relates as God’s first act in response to Adam and Eve’s disobedience.
Clothes, in covering us, symbolize the greater “covering” provided by the Incarnate Christ, in the Christian view. Thus, regeneration is incarnational. In What Not to Wear, this sacramental view of clothing is implicit in the dramatic changes wrought in the subject inwardly as she undergoes the external transformation. The (literal) material reflects the spiritual.
In addressing both the outward sign and the inward state that sensible sign reflects, What Not to Wear confronts—perhaps unwittingly—the false dualism between the spiritual and the physical, which characterizes modernity. Given this reunion of the material and spiritual that forms the entire premise of the show, it is not surprising that the show’s narrative structure parallels that of religious conversion.
Steps to Conversion
As always, the first step toward redemption is recognition of one’s fallenness. On What Not to Wear this recognition of one’s crimes of fashion begins with a surprise appearance by London and Kelly, who confront the style sinner with the damning footage taken of her in secret over the preceding two weeks. During this encounter, the subject is surrounded, intervention style, by the nominator and other concerned parties.
Once the nominee submits, usually reluctantly, to the rules of the show and is whisked off to NYC under the care of London and Kelly, she faces an even more grueling confrontation: the infamous 360-degree mirror. Surrounded by mirrors, she views herself from every angle, clothed in the favorite outfits of her choice, the failures of which are mercilessly pointed out by London and Kelly’s hellfire and brimstone approach to fashion foibles. Their brutal honesty (along with generous doses of delicious sarcasm) is the most controversial part of the show; it’s what makes most people love it or hate it (for the record, I love it!). As in most stories of redemption, recognition of the need for change tends to come slowly rather than quickly, and the well-coutured London and Kelly can’t be blamed for their zeal in evangelizing the style heathens.
Once she has broken through her denial, and her old wardrobe has been symbolically trashed (the clothes are actually donated to charity), the novice is catechized on the new rules that are to govern her two-day shopping spree (and, ostensibly, the rest of her life). As stern as these commandments might seem, it is clear from watching numerous episodes that London and Kelly develop custom rules for each woman based not only on what will be physically flattering but also on what fits her personality, taste, and lifestyle. This is no one-size-fits-all approach (with perhaps the single exception of their fetish for pointy-toed shoes), but rather a tailor-made approach for each catechumen, one based on her uniqueness as a whole person.
Generally, it is not until the second day of the shopping spree that true repentance begins to emerge (as much the result of sheer physical and emotional exhaustion as anything else), usually with a bit more intervention from London and Kelly. Once the shopping is finished and the $5,000 is spent (with a lot of help from London and Kelly), the final steps of conversion take place under the care of the hair stylist and makeup artist.
Final Step & Follow-Up
The climax of each show is the Big Reveal at the end. Before offering a sometimes-tearful goodbye to London and Kelly and returning home, the convert appears before them in a trinity of outfits for three types of occasions. At this point, the conversion is dramatically evident. Redemption has occurred: The female Peter Pan has grown up; the harried mother has taken time for herself; the sleazy strumpet has acquired some class; or the angry punk-rocker has embraced her softer side.
The convert is now ready to go home for the final step in her regeneration: the baptism by which she emerges as a new creature before family and friends at a gala held in her in honor. There, before the great cloud of witnesses made possible by cable television, hugs abound, tears flow, and loved ones share before the camera their joy at witnessing the rebirth.
In its first years, the show ended at this point. But just as religious revivalists have come to understand that follow-up is as important as the altar call, so has What Not to Wear added updates to the end of the show, displaying the perseverance of the fashion saint in embracing, yes, her new look, but more importantly, her new sense of self.
Even the most frivolous forms of entertainment teach something. What Not to Wear demonstrates that true regeneration involves body and soul. Only materialists or Gnostics would disagree.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
by Karen Swallow Prior
No, I’m not talking about the get-ups of the folks gathered at the summer tent revival held behind the used car lot. I’m talking about the phenomenon of The Learning Channel’s What Not to Wear. (Full disclosure: I am one of the faithful.)
In case you’ve been living under a rock or don’t get cable, What Not to Wear (based on a British show of the same name) is an hour-long “reality show” in which one of the fashion-fallen among us is secretly nominated by a concerned loved one, filmed surreptitiously for two weeks, then accosted by the show’s two hosts and fashion experts, Clinton Kelly and Stacy London. In exchange for a $5,000 shopping spree, the nominee must agree to surrender her old wardrobe and submit to a litany of fashion rules set by London and Kelly.
Behind the show’s long-running success (the US version has been on the air since 2003) is a formula as old as story itself, a pattern that includes the elements of any well-told story, as well as the one ingredient essential to any great story: redemption.
The True Quest
The protagonist of each What Not to Wear narrative is a reluctant heroine facing numerous obstacles in what superficially appears to be a rather shallow quest: to spend $5,000 on a new wardrobe that adheres to the new style rules. As with every quest, antagonists abound: the person who nominated the subject for the show (a friend, co-worker, or family member); the show’s benevolent but stern hosts London and Kelly; and the scissors-wielding and lipstick-bearing hair and make-up artists responsible for the final touches in the heroine’s transformation.
In any great story, however, the real quest turns out to be something altogether different from the ostensible one, something deeper and far more significant. In the Arthurian legends, for example, the quest for the Holy Grail is actually a quest for kinship in the face of all that threatens the community of the Round Table; in Great Expectations, Pip’s quest to become a gentleman according to his false definition becomes instead a quest to become a true gentleman; in Fight Club, the unnamed narrator’s quest to overcome depression and insomnia is really a quest for a unified sense of self in a depersonalized, commodified society. You get the idea. Likewise, in every episode of What Not to Wear, the true quest for the heroine always turns out to be much more than the merely sartorial.
In each segment, the central conflict ultimately is not with the show’s hosts, the conspiratorial nominator, or even the subject’s requisite battle with her (or his, but usually her) own physical imperfections, be they great or small. Rather, the true struggle is always the inner one. In episode after episode, the subject’s refusal to dress appropriately or attractively (or both) is rooted deep in the psyche and not in the surface-level external circumstances, be these financial distress, work challenges, parental responsibilities, or other personal difficulties.
Inner Battles
The documentary style of the show includes snippets of the subject’s thoughts at each stage of the makeover, and these invariably move through the same emotional arc: from nervous anticipation, to annoyance with London and Kelly and doubt over the new “rules,” to the inevitable breakthrough—that moment when the proselyte confronts (often tearfully) her real issue, be it low self-esteem, self-loathing, or the fear of growing up and accepting a real woman’s body. The battle against the body always turns out to be merely a cover for the battle against inner demons.
The following are typical of the battles faced on episodes of TLC’s What Not to Wear:
• Bailey is a 32-year-old who “recently lost 60 pounds but still hasn’t accepted her new body.”
• Teresa “never felt beautiful” and “chose comfort over style, with sack dresses and oversized tops.”
• Disa “was in a mid-life style crisis” and had “been looking for the fountain of youth in her tween daughter’s closet, often wearing bright-colored jumpers, striped leggings and silly hats” as a walking fashion “playground.”
• Tamara is “a single mom who knew only one word when it came to style: sexy. Her wardrobe went from unflattering and clingy at work to skin tight and almost uncovered at night!”
• Lexa is “a 30-year-old Red Cross employee” and “one of the biggest challenges London and Kelly ever faced. Her ‘librarian meets French maid’ style had gotten her written up at work.”
The “after” state of Lexa—achieved, according to the website, once “London and Kelly helped her overcome her abrasive and defensive attitude and achieve a true life change”—exemplifies the total transformation that typifies each show. And “total” refers not simply to the addition of hair and makeup improvements to the new wardrobe, but rather to an inner, as well as outer, change.
Clothes Matter
Of course, every good story has a significant theme. And the show’s theme—that clothes matter—is also what makes the show work. For whatever else they might be or represent, clothes serve as a constant reminder of humanity’s need, as explained in the Judeo-Christian tradition, arising out of the Fall, to have our sin “covered.” We see this in what Genesis relates as God’s first act in response to Adam and Eve’s disobedience.
Clothes, in covering us, symbolize the greater “covering” provided by the Incarnate Christ, in the Christian view. Thus, regeneration is incarnational. In What Not to Wear, this sacramental view of clothing is implicit in the dramatic changes wrought in the subject inwardly as she undergoes the external transformation. The (literal) material reflects the spiritual.
In addressing both the outward sign and the inward state that sensible sign reflects, What Not to Wear confronts—perhaps unwittingly—the false dualism between the spiritual and the physical, which characterizes modernity. Given this reunion of the material and spiritual that forms the entire premise of the show, it is not surprising that the show’s narrative structure parallels that of religious conversion.
Steps to Conversion
As always, the first step toward redemption is recognition of one’s fallenness. On What Not to Wear this recognition of one’s crimes of fashion begins with a surprise appearance by London and Kelly, who confront the style sinner with the damning footage taken of her in secret over the preceding two weeks. During this encounter, the subject is surrounded, intervention style, by the nominator and other concerned parties.
Once the nominee submits, usually reluctantly, to the rules of the show and is whisked off to NYC under the care of London and Kelly, she faces an even more grueling confrontation: the infamous 360-degree mirror. Surrounded by mirrors, she views herself from every angle, clothed in the favorite outfits of her choice, the failures of which are mercilessly pointed out by London and Kelly’s hellfire and brimstone approach to fashion foibles. Their brutal honesty (along with generous doses of delicious sarcasm) is the most controversial part of the show; it’s what makes most people love it or hate it (for the record, I love it!). As in most stories of redemption, recognition of the need for change tends to come slowly rather than quickly, and the well-coutured London and Kelly can’t be blamed for their zeal in evangelizing the style heathens.
Once she has broken through her denial, and her old wardrobe has been symbolically trashed (the clothes are actually donated to charity), the novice is catechized on the new rules that are to govern her two-day shopping spree (and, ostensibly, the rest of her life). As stern as these commandments might seem, it is clear from watching numerous episodes that London and Kelly develop custom rules for each woman based not only on what will be physically flattering but also on what fits her personality, taste, and lifestyle. This is no one-size-fits-all approach (with perhaps the single exception of their fetish for pointy-toed shoes), but rather a tailor-made approach for each catechumen, one based on her uniqueness as a whole person.
Generally, it is not until the second day of the shopping spree that true repentance begins to emerge (as much the result of sheer physical and emotional exhaustion as anything else), usually with a bit more intervention from London and Kelly. Once the shopping is finished and the $5,000 is spent (with a lot of help from London and Kelly), the final steps of conversion take place under the care of the hair stylist and makeup artist.
Final Step & Follow-Up
The climax of each show is the Big Reveal at the end. Before offering a sometimes-tearful goodbye to London and Kelly and returning home, the convert appears before them in a trinity of outfits for three types of occasions. At this point, the conversion is dramatically evident. Redemption has occurred: The female Peter Pan has grown up; the harried mother has taken time for herself; the sleazy strumpet has acquired some class; or the angry punk-rocker has embraced her softer side.
The convert is now ready to go home for the final step in her regeneration: the baptism by which she emerges as a new creature before family and friends at a gala held in her in honor. There, before the great cloud of witnesses made possible by cable television, hugs abound, tears flow, and loved ones share before the camera their joy at witnessing the rebirth.
In its first years, the show ended at this point. But just as religious revivalists have come to understand that follow-up is as important as the altar call, so has What Not to Wear added updates to the end of the show, displaying the perseverance of the fashion saint in embracing, yes, her new look, but more importantly, her new sense of self.
Even the most frivolous forms of entertainment teach something. What Not to Wear demonstrates that true regeneration involves body and soul. Only materialists or Gnostics would disagree.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Inspiration in the key of awesome
Video: 'Miracles' musical mash-up
Song on Miracles that leads me to smile and enjoy the beauty of life and truth and all things hopeful.... See a beautifully produced music video mash-up with artists from several genres blended into one song, "Miracles."
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
marriage and the call for redemptive leadership
I have been thinking a lot about test God puts in the path of a marriage. My thoughts brought me back to a man i greatly admire and I draw strength from his testimony. May his story do the same for you. The except below is from my thesis on marriage.
Historical Example of a Marriage Marked by the Intellectual Attributes
A marriage centered on God and His attributes is a marriage that functions well in adversity. The wisdom of God rules the heart, the truthfulness of God stabilizes it, and God’s knowledge of man and his destiny secures it, in His love.
A newlywed couple was walking in the German Harz Mountains enjoying the scenery, but they did not realize until it was too late that a storm was fast approaching. Surrounded by lightening and thunder, the bride was overcome with fear. Though the two made it home safely, the bride suffered a nervous breakdown which left her frail and an invalid for the rest of her life.
The woman’s name was Annie Warfield. She was the wife of theologian Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield, who was considered one of American’s top theologians at the time. He studied under Charles Hodge at Princeton Seminary and was a Professor at Princeton until his death in 1921. Annie and Benjamin were married August 13, 1876. Soon after they traveled to Europe so Benjamin could study there. The two had their faithful encounter with the violent storm just before Benajmin began his studies.
Annie never fully recovered. In her last years, Annie was bedridden and in need of constant attention. Warfield became her primary care giver, and he faithfully nursed her for more than 40 years of marriage. Students and friends noted the tender care he showed his wife during the rare times they were out in public. In the later years, Benjamin did not leave her side for more than two hours at a time, leaving only to do lecture before rushing back home to her aid.
Amazingly, he did not neglect his duties at Princeton. He was an author, and he was a mentor to many of his pupils. J. Gresham Machen stated that Warfield “had done about as much work as ten ordinary men.” Yet, sacrifices were required. Warfield was a man of considerable talent who could command a great influence over the church at large, but he had the wisdom to see that his primary task was to tend to his house and wife. He gave up fame out of love and chose the bedside over the prominence of the pulpit. It is no doubt why one pupil wrote, “I am more and more impressed with him; he is certainly one of the very biggest men in the Church either in this country or any other.”
Before he was a theologian and a husband, Warfield was a great lover of God. He understood the nature of God as wise and truthful. He trusted in the sovereignty of God. The sure footing with which his marriage held is surely a witness to Warfield’s belief in God’s wisdom and knowledge over all circumstances. It was his abiding understanding of God’s nature that made the doldrums of suffering in his marriage; resound with the melody of redemptive leadership. He saw his God given place to be a husband and remained by his wife’s side even when putting her away could have been justified even in the formal and rather Victorian setting in which he lived. God and Warfield's knowledge of him strengthened and girded up his soul to bear the weight of such a glory (Rom 8:17-18). His witness shimmered with the brilliance of this glory, a glory born of suffering; eerily reminiscent of the cross and beautifully emblematic of Redemptive love.
Historical Example of a Marriage Marked by the Intellectual Attributes
A marriage centered on God and His attributes is a marriage that functions well in adversity. The wisdom of God rules the heart, the truthfulness of God stabilizes it, and God’s knowledge of man and his destiny secures it, in His love.
A newlywed couple was walking in the German Harz Mountains enjoying the scenery, but they did not realize until it was too late that a storm was fast approaching. Surrounded by lightening and thunder, the bride was overcome with fear. Though the two made it home safely, the bride suffered a nervous breakdown which left her frail and an invalid for the rest of her life.
The woman’s name was Annie Warfield. She was the wife of theologian Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield, who was considered one of American’s top theologians at the time. He studied under Charles Hodge at Princeton Seminary and was a Professor at Princeton until his death in 1921. Annie and Benjamin were married August 13, 1876. Soon after they traveled to Europe so Benjamin could study there. The two had their faithful encounter with the violent storm just before Benajmin began his studies.
Annie never fully recovered. In her last years, Annie was bedridden and in need of constant attention. Warfield became her primary care giver, and he faithfully nursed her for more than 40 years of marriage. Students and friends noted the tender care he showed his wife during the rare times they were out in public. In the later years, Benjamin did not leave her side for more than two hours at a time, leaving only to do lecture before rushing back home to her aid.
Amazingly, he did not neglect his duties at Princeton. He was an author, and he was a mentor to many of his pupils. J. Gresham Machen stated that Warfield “had done about as much work as ten ordinary men.” Yet, sacrifices were required. Warfield was a man of considerable talent who could command a great influence over the church at large, but he had the wisdom to see that his primary task was to tend to his house and wife. He gave up fame out of love and chose the bedside over the prominence of the pulpit. It is no doubt why one pupil wrote, “I am more and more impressed with him; he is certainly one of the very biggest men in the Church either in this country or any other.”
Before he was a theologian and a husband, Warfield was a great lover of God. He understood the nature of God as wise and truthful. He trusted in the sovereignty of God. The sure footing with which his marriage held is surely a witness to Warfield’s belief in God’s wisdom and knowledge over all circumstances. It was his abiding understanding of God’s nature that made the doldrums of suffering in his marriage; resound with the melody of redemptive leadership. He saw his God given place to be a husband and remained by his wife’s side even when putting her away could have been justified even in the formal and rather Victorian setting in which he lived. God and Warfield's knowledge of him strengthened and girded up his soul to bear the weight of such a glory (Rom 8:17-18). His witness shimmered with the brilliance of this glory, a glory born of suffering; eerily reminiscent of the cross and beautifully emblematic of Redemptive love.
Friday, December 24, 2010
Hope in Living Color
Here is a great outline on hope by Adrian Warnock "Abound in Hope"
I added a few points myself.
Intro
True hope is a uniquely Christian thing – like faith and love – we need the help of God’s Spirit as We seek to explain What the bible teach.
ABOUND IN HOPE!
Romans 15:13. “May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope.”
WHERE DOES HOPE COME FROM?
Psalm 39:7. “And now, O Lord, for what do I wait? My hope is in you.”
Ephesians 2:12. “. . . remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.”
WHAT IS HOPE?
IT IS A LIFE OF JOY AND PEACE, NOT SORROW AND STRESS!
Hope is hunger for and confidence in God.
Hope is holding to a promise from a faithful God.
Proverbs 13:12. “Hope deferred makes the heart sick, but a desire fulfilled is a tree of life.”
Romans 8:23-25. “And not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies. For in this hope we were saved. Now hope that is seen is not hope. For who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.”
Romans 8:28 “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”
1 Peter 3:15-16. “....but in your hearts regard Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you.”
1 Corinthians 15:19. “If in this life only we have hoped in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied.”
HOW DO WE GET HOPE?
1. By Believing Patiently.
Hebrews 6:11-20. “And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness to have the full assurance of hope until the end, so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.”
2. By the Word.
Romans 15:4. “. . . through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.”
3. By the Holy Spirit. (Rom 5:13)
His sovereign movement on our heart.
We can be sure that if we "want" to hope - that is the Spirit's working the first fruit of hope in you.
HOW MUCH HOPE IS ENOUGH?
Ephesians 3:20. “Now to him who is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think, according to the power at work within us …”
WHAT DOES HOPE LOOK LIKE?
2 Corinthians 3:12. “Since we have such a hope, we are very bold.”
I added a few points myself.
Intro
True hope is a uniquely Christian thing – like faith and love – we need the help of God’s Spirit as We seek to explain What the bible teach.
ABOUND IN HOPE!
Romans 15:13. “May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope.”
WHERE DOES HOPE COME FROM?
Psalm 39:7. “And now, O Lord, for what do I wait? My hope is in you.”
Ephesians 2:12. “. . . remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.”
WHAT IS HOPE?
IT IS A LIFE OF JOY AND PEACE, NOT SORROW AND STRESS!
Hope is hunger for and confidence in God.
Hope is holding to a promise from a faithful God.
Proverbs 13:12. “Hope deferred makes the heart sick, but a desire fulfilled is a tree of life.”
Romans 8:23-25. “And not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies. For in this hope we were saved. Now hope that is seen is not hope. For who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.”
Romans 8:28 “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”
1 Peter 3:15-16. “....but in your hearts regard Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you.”
1 Corinthians 15:19. “If in this life only we have hoped in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied.”
HOW DO WE GET HOPE?
1. By Believing Patiently.
Hebrews 6:11-20. “And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness to have the full assurance of hope until the end, so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.”
2. By the Word.
Romans 15:4. “. . . through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.”
3. By the Holy Spirit. (Rom 5:13)
His sovereign movement on our heart.
We can be sure that if we "want" to hope - that is the Spirit's working the first fruit of hope in you.
HOW MUCH HOPE IS ENOUGH?
Ephesians 3:20. “Now to him who is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think, according to the power at work within us …”
WHAT DOES HOPE LOOK LIKE?
2 Corinthians 3:12. “Since we have such a hope, we are very bold.”
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Why read to your children: a testimonial.
As most know I am dyslexic and a writer(want-a-be). I have a love hate relationship with words. One of my earliest memories is of my mother reading to me, "bible stories" and passages from, "Where the side walk ends." so when I read this quote from Pat Conroy i was deeply moved. I found myself in the passage like someone rests in their own bed after a long journey. You see, through all my hate of words, with there twisted posters and attempts to confuse, I found a love for the truth, and a desire for reality. I saw words as a sailor sees a boat. They carry us across the ageless, voiceless seas that separate people. They even make a way through our personal river Styx. On them we ride back from the dead into a land blossoming with meaning and life. Words gave me passage and my heart wings for by them I saw the world as a lover sees his love, and as God sees us all, purely, clearly, beautifully real.
Pat Conroy writes of how this same love of words came to him and he skillfully uses them to that end.
“I grew up a word-haunted boy. I felt words inside me and stored them wondrous as pearls. I mouthed them and fingered them and rolled them around my tongue.
My mother filled my bedtime hour with poetry that rang like Sanctus bells as she praised the ineffable loveliness of the English language with her Georgia-scented voice. I found that hive of words beautiful beyond all conveyance.
They clung to me and blistered my skin and made me happy to be alive in the land of crape myrtle, spot-tailed bass, and eastern diamondbacks. The precise naming of things served as my entryway into art.
The whole world could be sounded out. I could arrange each day into a tear sheet of music composed of words as pretty as flutes or the tail feathers of peacocks.
From my earliest memories, I felt impelled to form a unique relationship with the English language. I used words to fashion a world that made sense to me.”
–Pat Conroy, My Reading Life, (New York: Doubleday, 2010), 55.
Reading to your children is important, looking back, I can say it was a means of common grace on a uncommon boy. They did not just define my reality, line by line they beautified it with golden strains of meaning connecting all things in a tapestry I now call "faith". All because a mother, a book, and a boy, met every night before bed.
The word became flesh and dwelt among us. (John 1:14)
Reading to your child can incarnate such a reality even in the most dogmatic enemy of words. It may even be God's way of preparing our little ones for the beauty of faith.
Merry Christmas --
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Pat Conroy writes of how this same love of words came to him and he skillfully uses them to that end.
“I grew up a word-haunted boy. I felt words inside me and stored them wondrous as pearls. I mouthed them and fingered them and rolled them around my tongue.
My mother filled my bedtime hour with poetry that rang like Sanctus bells as she praised the ineffable loveliness of the English language with her Georgia-scented voice. I found that hive of words beautiful beyond all conveyance.
They clung to me and blistered my skin and made me happy to be alive in the land of crape myrtle, spot-tailed bass, and eastern diamondbacks. The precise naming of things served as my entryway into art.
The whole world could be sounded out. I could arrange each day into a tear sheet of music composed of words as pretty as flutes or the tail feathers of peacocks.
From my earliest memories, I felt impelled to form a unique relationship with the English language. I used words to fashion a world that made sense to me.”
–Pat Conroy, My Reading Life, (New York: Doubleday, 2010), 55.
Reading to your children is important, looking back, I can say it was a means of common grace on a uncommon boy. They did not just define my reality, line by line they beautified it with golden strains of meaning connecting all things in a tapestry I now call "faith". All because a mother, a book, and a boy, met every night before bed.
The word became flesh and dwelt among us. (John 1:14)
Reading to your child can incarnate such a reality even in the most dogmatic enemy of words. It may even be God's way of preparing our little ones for the beauty of faith.
Merry Christmas --
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Piper and the Baptism of the Spirit.
John Piper takes a refreshing perspectives on the fullness of the Holy Spirit in a sermon he gave last november. I have always desired the church to be open and I like how he sidesteps the major hinderance to openness; issue of identifying baptism with the Holy Spirit as either conversion or a second blessing. Piper encourages us all to be open to more infusions of the Holy Spirit whatever our theological position. This sermon is on John 1:25-34, where Jesus is described as the "one who baptizes with the Holy Spirit." Piper writes/says/preaches:
Jesus immerses people in the Spirit. That’s what the word baptize means. There are pictures in the Bible of the Spirit being poured out. But when the idea of baptism (that is, dipping or immersion) is brought in, the point is that the Spirit is poured over us to such an extent that we are enveloped in him.
The point of this image is that the Spirit becomes profoundly and pervasively influential in our lives. When you are immersed in something, it touches you everywhere. So when John says that Jesus is going to baptize with the Spirit, he means that the day is coming when the lives of God’s people will be plunged into the life of the Spirit with profound and pervasive effects. . .
As I have tried to let John define for us what he means by baptism with the Spirit, it seems to me that the term is a broad, overarching one that includes the whole great saving, sanctifying, and empowering work of the Spirit in this age. I don’t think it is a technical term that refers to one part of the Christian life—say conversion, or speaking in tongues, or a bold act of witness. It is the continual, and sometimes extraordinary, outpouring of the Holy Spirit on God’s people. It immerses them not just in one or two, but in hundreds of his powerful influences.
In other words, if you are not born again, one way to describe your need is that you need to be baptized with the Spirit. That is, you need to be plunged into God’s Spirit with the effect that you will be born again and come to faith in Christ. If you are born again, but you are languishing in a season of weakness and fear and defeat, one way to describe what you need is to be baptized in the Spirit. That is, you need a fresh outpouring of his Christ-revealing, heart-awakening, sin-defeating, boldness-producing power. Every spiritual need that we have before and after conversion is supplied by Christ immersing us in greater and lesser degrees in the Holy Spirit.
Amen John - We all need fresh oil...
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Jesus immerses people in the Spirit. That’s what the word baptize means. There are pictures in the Bible of the Spirit being poured out. But when the idea of baptism (that is, dipping or immersion) is brought in, the point is that the Spirit is poured over us to such an extent that we are enveloped in him.
The point of this image is that the Spirit becomes profoundly and pervasively influential in our lives. When you are immersed in something, it touches you everywhere. So when John says that Jesus is going to baptize with the Spirit, he means that the day is coming when the lives of God’s people will be plunged into the life of the Spirit with profound and pervasive effects. . .
As I have tried to let John define for us what he means by baptism with the Spirit, it seems to me that the term is a broad, overarching one that includes the whole great saving, sanctifying, and empowering work of the Spirit in this age. I don’t think it is a technical term that refers to one part of the Christian life—say conversion, or speaking in tongues, or a bold act of witness. It is the continual, and sometimes extraordinary, outpouring of the Holy Spirit on God’s people. It immerses them not just in one or two, but in hundreds of his powerful influences.
In other words, if you are not born again, one way to describe your need is that you need to be baptized with the Spirit. That is, you need to be plunged into God’s Spirit with the effect that you will be born again and come to faith in Christ. If you are born again, but you are languishing in a season of weakness and fear and defeat, one way to describe what you need is to be baptized in the Spirit. That is, you need a fresh outpouring of his Christ-revealing, heart-awakening, sin-defeating, boldness-producing power. Every spiritual need that we have before and after conversion is supplied by Christ immersing us in greater and lesser degrees in the Holy Spirit.
Amen John - We all need fresh oil...
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)